HOME  |  CONTENTS  |  DISCUSSIONS  BLOG  |  QUICK-KITs|  STATES

Google

       Search WWW Search wifcon.com

A-76, Handbook: Part I, Ch. 3, F-2 - Security of Most Efficient Organization (MEO) document

Comptroller General - Key Excerpts

The record establishes that the in-house estimate was approved and sealed prior to the time when the agency received Symvionics's proposal.  Further, while the MP/MEO was not sealed, it was approved on May 5, prior to receipt of the Symvionics proposal.

Copies of this MP/MEO were kept in locked drawers by the IRO and Mr. B, the cost analyst, on and after May 5 and were not removed until after the cost comparison was made on May 27. There is no evidence that the estimated cost or MP/MEO were changed in any substantive way from May 5 through May 27. The only substantive changes were made during the review process and pursuant to the recommendations of the AAP and did not incorporate any information from the protester's proposal.[4] Thus, it is clear from the record Symvionics was not prejudiced by the agency's failure to follow this procedural requirement.  (Symvionics, Inc., B-281199.2, March 4, 1999)

Comptroller General - Listing of Decisions

For the Government For the Protester
Symvionics, Inc., B-281199.2, March 4, 1999  

 

Legal

Protests

Bona Fide Needs Rule
Public Laws
Legislation
Courts & Boards


Rules & Tools
Workforce
Reading

Small Business
 

   
 
 

ABOUT  l CONTACT