[Federal Register: June 27, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 124)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43513-43514]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27jn02-20]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 17, 31, 33, 49, and 52
[FAC 2001-08; FAR Case 2000-406; Item I]
RIN 9000-AJ19
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Definition of ``Claim'' and Terms
Relating to Termination
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule
amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify and move
the definitions of ``claim'' and certain terms relating to termination
to the FAR part regarding definitions.
DATES: Effective Date: July 29, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS
Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501-4755, for information
pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of
content, contact Ms. Linda Klein, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-
3775. Please cite FAC 2001-08, FAR case 2000-406.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The purpose of this rule is to clarify the applicability of
definitions, eliminate redundant or conflicting definitions, and
streamline the process for locating definitions. This rule is not
intended to change the meaning of any FAR text or clause. Movement of
various definitions to FAR 2.101 is not intended to change the
operation of the cost principles, and specifically the movement of the
definition of ``claim'' to FAR 2.101 is not intended to change the
scope or context of FAR 31.205-47(f)(1).
This final rule--
Revises and moves the definitions of ``claim'' from
33.201; ``continued portion of the contract,'' ``partial termination,''
``terminated portion of the contract'' from FAR 49.001; and
``termination for convenience'' from FAR 17.103;
Adds a definition of ``termination for default'' at FAR
2.101 and a new paragraph 17.104(d) that explains the distinction
between ``termination for convenience'' and ``cancellation'' that was
deleted from the definition of ``termination for convenience'' that was
moved from FAR 17.103;
Revises FAR 33.213(a) to clarify the distinction between
claims ``arising under a contract'' and claims ``relating to a
contract'';
Revises the definition of ``claim'' in the clause at FAR
52.233-1 to conform to the definition at FAR 2.101; and
Makes other editorial revisions for clarity.
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register at 66 FR 42922, August 15, 2001, with a request for comment.
One respondent submitted two comments to the proposed rule. The
Councils considered and accepted both comments. The rule was modified
as a result. The first comment recommended that the parenthetical
reference at FAR 31.205(f)(1) be changed to reflect the new location of
the definition of ``claim'' at FAR 2.101. This was done. The second
comment recommended that a clarifying statement be added to the Federal
Register notice stating that the movement of the various definitions to
FAR 2.101 is not intended to change the operation of the cost
principles, and specifically the movement of the definition of
``claim'' to FAR 2.101 is not intended to change the scope of FAR
31.205-47(f)(1). This was also done.
This is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule does not
change policy. We did not receive any comments regarding this
determination as a result of publication of the proposed rule in the
Federal Register on August 15, 2001 (66 FR 42922).
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 17, 31, 33, 49, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: June 19, 2002.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 2, 17, 31, 33, 49,
and 52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 2, 17, 31, 33, 49, and
52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 2--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
2. Amend section 2.101 by adding, in alphabetical order, the
definitions ``Claim,'' ``Continued portion of the contract,'' ``Partial
termination,'' ``Termination for convenience,'' ``Termination for
default,'' and ``Terminated portion of the contract'' to read as
follows:
2.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
Claim means a written demand or written assertion by one of the
contracting parties seeking, as a matter of right, the payment of money
in a sum certain, the adjustment or interpretation of contract terms,
or other relief arising under or relating to the contract. However, a
written demand or written assertion by the contractor seeking the
payment of money exceeding $100,000 is not a claim under the Contract
Disputes Act of 1978 until certified as required by the Act. A voucher,
invoice, or other routine request for payment that is not in dispute
when submitted is not a claim. The submission may be converted to a
claim, by written notice to the contracting officer as provided in
[[Page 43514]]
33.206(a), if it is disputed either as to liability or amount or is not
acted upon in a reasonable time.
* * * * *
Continued portion of the contract means the portion of a contract
that the contractor must continue to perform following a partial
termination.
* * * * *
Partial termination means the termination of a part, but not all,
of the work that has not been completed and accepted under a contract.
* * * * *
Termination for convenience means the exercise of the Government's
right to completely or partially terminate performance of work under a
contract when it is in the Government's interest.
Termination for default means the exercise of the Government's
right to completely or partially terminate a contract because of the
contractor's actual or anticipated failure to perform its contractual
obligations.
Terminated portion of the contract means the portion of a contract
that the contractor is not to perform following a partial termination.
For construction contracts that have been completely terminated for
convenience, it means the entire contract, notwithstanding the
completion of, and payment for, individual items of work before
termination.
* * * * *
PART 17--SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
17.103 [Amended]
3. Amend section 17.103 by removing the definition ``Termination
for convenience.''
4. Amend section 17.104 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
17.104 General.
* * * * *
(d) The termination for convenience procedure may apply to any
Government contract, including multiyear contracts. As contrasted with
cancellation, termination can be effected at any time during the life
of the contract (cancellation is effected between fiscal years) and can
be for the total quantity or partial quantity (where as cancellation
must be for all subsequent fiscal years' quantities).
PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
31.205-47 [Amended]
5. Amend section 31.205-47 in paragraph (f)(1) by removing ``(see
33.201)'' and adding ``(see 2.101)'' in its place.
PART 33--PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS
33.201 [Amended]
6. Amend section 33.201 by removing the definition ``Claim.''
7. Amend section 33.213 by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
33.213 Obligation to continue performance.
(a) In general, before passage of the Act, the obligation to
continue performance applied only to claims arising under a contract.
However, the Act, at 41 U.S.C. 605(b), authorizes agencies to require a
contractor to continue contract performance in accordance with the
contracting officer's decision pending a final resolution of any claim
arising under, or relating to, the contract. (A claim arising under a
contract is a claim that can be resolved under a contract clause, other
than the clause at 52.233-1, Disputes, that provides for the relief
sought by the claimant; however, relief for such claim can also be
sought under the clause at 52.233-1. A claim relating to a contract is
a claim that cannot be resolved under a contract clause other than the
clause at 52.233-1.) This distinction is recognized by the clause with
its Alternate I (see 33.215).
* * * * *
PART 49--TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS
49.001 [Amended]
8. Amend section 49.001 by removing the definitions ``Claim,''
``Continued portion of the contract,'' ``Partial termination,'' and
``Terminated portion of the contract.''
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.213-4 [Amended]
9. Amend section 52.213-4 by revising the date of the clause to
read ``(7/02)''; and by removing from paragraph (a)(2)(v) ``(Dec
1998)'' and adding ``7/02'' in its place.
10. Amend section 52.233-1 by revising the date and paragraph (c)
of the clause; and by revising the introductory paragraph of Alternate
I to read as follows:
52.233-1 Disputes.
* * * * *
Disputes (7/02)
* * * * *
(c) Claim, as used in this clause, means a written demand or
written assertion by one of the contracting parties seeking, as a
matter of right, the payment of money in a sum certain, the
adjustment or interpretation of contract terms, or other relief
arising under or relating to this contract. However, a written
demand or written assertion by the Contractor seeking the payment of
money exceeding $100,000 is not a claim under the Act until
certified. A voucher, invoice, or other routine request for payment
that is not in dispute when submitted is not a claim under the Act.
The submission may be converted to a claim under the Act, by
complying with the submission and certification requirements of this
clause, if it is disputed either as to liability or amount or is not
acted upon in a reasonable time.
* * * * *
Alternate I (Dec 1991). As prescribed in 33.215, substitute the
following paragraph (i) for paragraph (i) of the basic clause:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 02-15940 Filed 6-26-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P