[Federal Register: March 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 53)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13414-13415]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19mr10-14]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 15
[FAC 2005-39; FAR Case 2008-012; Item II; Docket 2008-0001, Sequence
23]
RIN 9000-AL12
Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2008-012, Clarification
of Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on Non-Commercial Modifications
of Commercial Items
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have adopted as final, with
minor changes, an interim rule which amended the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to implement section 814 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008. Section 814
required the harmonization of the thresholds for cost or pricing data.
Specifically, section 814 required alignment of the threshold for cost
or pricing data on non-commercial modifications of commercial items
with the Truth In Negotiation Act (TINA) threshold for cost or pricing
data.
DATES: Effective Date: March 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edward Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 501-3221 for clarification of content. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
FAR Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-39, FAR case
2008-012.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the Federal
Register at 74 FR 11826 on March 19, 2009, to implement section 814 of
the NDAA for FY 2008. Section 814 implemented two areas of
clarification with regards to the submission of cost or pricing data on
non-commercial modifications of commercial items.
The comment period closed on May 18, 2009, with one comment
received. The respondent opined that the addition of the new FAR text
``at the time of contract award'' was unclear. The respondent indicated
that a contract's initial price subsequently changes based upon
modifications and inquired if the total price ``at time of contract
award'' included subsequent modifications that changed the initial
contract price. The respondent also highlighted the example of an
indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract where orders
are issued and inquired whether ``at the time of contract award''
related to issuance of the IDIQ contract or individual orders placed
under this IDIQ contract. The respondent also offered examples of
possible revised language.
The Councils believe that, with minor changes, the language in the
interim rule is appropriate. Section 814 of the NDAA for FY 2008
required the insertion of the language ``at time of contract award''
after the language ``total price of contract'', which is already
contained in FAR 15.403-1. This language is being added to clarify at
what point during the life of the contract that the cost or pricing
threshold should be applied under FAR 15.403-1. The Councils believe
that the language ``at the time of contract award'' clearly indicates
that subsequent modifications, other than those which meet the
triggering thresholds of TINA themselves, that change a contract's
price are not factored into determining when the cost or pricing
threshold should be applied under FAR 15.403-1. In the case of IDIQ
contracts, it is commonly understood that it is the estimated total
value of orders for the specified period at the time of contract award,
as well as the individual value of any subsequent discrete orders, to
which the TINA thresholds apply. Consequently, the final rule language
reflects only minor editorial changes.
This is a significant regulatory action and therefore, was subject
to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., since it is harmonizing FAR
15.403-1 with other parts of the FAR and should actually reduce the
administrative burden on contractors by not requiring them to track two
separate dollar thresholds for submitting cost or pricing data. It is
also increasing this dollar threshold relative to the submittal of cost
or pricing data in this situation and thus contractors will experience
a reduced administrative burden since they no longer will be required
to submit cost or pricing data on this lower threshold amount.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 15
Government procurement.
Dated: March 15, 2010.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
0
Accordingly, the interim rule published in the Federal Register at 74
FR 11826 on March 19, 2009, is adopted as a final rule with the
following changes:
PART 15--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 15 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
0
2. Amend section 15.403-1 by revising paragraphs (c)(3)(iii)(B) and
(c)(3)(iii)(C) to read as follows:
[[Page 13415]]
15.403-1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C.
2306a and 41 U.S.C. 254b).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) For acquisitions funded by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard, such
modifications of a commercial item are exempt from the requirement for
submission of cost or pricing data provided the total price of all such
modifications under a particular contract action does not exceed the
greater of the threshold for obtaining cost or pricing data in 15.403-4
or 5 percent of the total price of the contract at the time of contract
award.
(C) For acquisitions funded by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard, such
modifications of a commercial item are not exempt from the requirement
for submission of cost or pricing data on the basis of the exemption
provided for at FAR 15.403-1(c)(3) if the total price of all such
modifications under a particular contract action exceeds the greater of
the threshold for obtaining cost or pricing data in 15.403-4 or 5
percent of the total price of the contract at the time of contract
award.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-5986 Filed 3-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S