g
Copper Level
Username:
Post Number:
29
Registered:
09-2007
|
Posted on
Monday, October 15, 2007 - 10:29 am:
Can anyone explain to me the term "Net Open Commitments"?
I think it relates to customer reporting of commitments vs.
expenditures. Is it something one would need to address in
an Internal Sweep conducted prior to executing a certificate
of current cost or pricing data under TINA? |
j
New Poster
Username:
Post Number:
2
Registered:
09-2007
|
Posted on
Monday, October 15, 2007 - 11:42 am:
In what context is the term used? "Commitment" is a term
of art in government accounting that may not translate
directly to private industry accounting. |
g
Copper Level
Username:
Post Number:
32
Registered:
09-2007
|
Posted on
Monday, October 15, 2007 - 01:28 pm:
I am seeing it used in the context of pricing of Bill of
Materials. |
j
New Poster
Username:
Post Number:
4
Registered:
09-2007
|
Posted on
Monday, October 15, 2007 - 02:16 pm:
It sounds like the term relates to an estimate of the
costs for obligations to vendors and subcontractors that
have not yet been booked in the accounting system -- i.e.,
the total estimated costs associated with purchase orders
and subcontracts awarded, less any accrued costs already
recorded for those POs and subcontracts.
I've seen the term used in contracts that contain Cost Funds
Status Report (CFSR) requirements, and open commitments
ordinarily wouldn't apply to new contract proposals.
However, they could be a routine consideration in
negotiation of contract modifications, regardless of whether
or not a CFSR is required, and if the mod is subject to the
TINA, I believe open commitments would meet the definition
of "cost or pricing data" covered by any certificate of
current cost or pricing data.
When it comes to the TINA and executing certificates of
current cost or pricing data, I'd recommend addressing all
factual data included with the proposal in any internal
sweep prior to execution of the certificate.
J |
g
Copper Level
Username:
Post Number:
34
Registered:
09-2007
|
Posted on
Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 08:52 am:
J, thanks. That is what I thought it might be. We don't
have any contracts that are TINA covered that have
modifications in process, so it is good to know the context
in order to be prepared in the future. |