|
|
|
HOME | CONTENTS | DISCUSSIONS | BLOG | QUICK-KITs| STATES |
Search WWW Search wifcon.com |
Cost Accounting Standards - Disclosure statement | |
---|---|
By
William Johnson on Friday, May 18, 2001 - 02:59 pm:
What is the primary reason for a disclosure statement?
Appendix B of the Far is 143 pages and I just want a simple
answer. Why is it so important in negotiated contracts? I would
just like CAS explained to me. What are they looking for? I know
to ensure that the contractor is not wasting the government
monies, and the types of coverage Full coverage, modified
coverage. If someone would just explain the purpose of CAS maybe
I will get a better understanding. By Anonymous on Friday, May 18, 2001 - 04:31 pm: The primary reason for a disclosure statement is to describe how the contractor accounts for costs. The purpose for CAS is to establish uniform procedures for accounting for costs, which, in theory, facilitates the negotiation of contracts and modifications. By John Ford on Saturday, May 19, 2001 - 05:27 pm: WJ, in the early 1970's congress asked GAO to do a study to
determine if it was feasible to establish a uniform system for
accounting for costs on negotiated government contracts. The
concern was that because of the wide latitude afforded
contractors for accounting for costs under generally accepted
accountimg principles that it was difficult to evaluate
comparative costs on negotiated contracts. What congress was
aiming for was a system where all contractors accounted for
major cost elements in a fairly uniform fashion so that there
would be a level playing field and the government would be able
to get a better fix on just what it was costing to acquire
supplies and services. Not surprisingly, GAO said it was
feasible to do so and the CAS Board was created to set up the
standards congress was seeking. By Anonymous on Sunday, May 20, 2001 - 08:01 pm: To add to John's background-- By Casius Farquarht on Monday, May 21, 2001 - 01:15 pm: Let's be honest folks! We all know that this law was mis-titled, it should have been the Accountants, Attorneys, and Consultant's Retirement Act |