|
|
|
HOME | CONTENTS | DISCUSSIONS | BLOG | QUICK-KITs| STATES |
Search WWW Search wifcon.com |
Canceling an IFB when low bid is less than funds available | |
---|---|
By Anonymous
on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 12:11 pm:
Will someone please provide a reference answering the following question? Must a Federal Construction contract be awarded if total amount of funds available is $405,700 and the lowest responsive, responsible bid is $405,500? My feeling is that it must be awarded since funds are available, but, I cannot find a reference. By Anonymous on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 12:24 pm: In part 14 of the FAR under bid cancellation. By Vern Edwards on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 12:39 pm: Why do you ask? Are you worried
that the bid is too low? If so, then you probably cannot
withhold award on that basis alone. If you think that the bid is
too low you must determine whether or not the low responsive
bidder is financially responsible. If it is, then you will
probably have to award the contract unless you have some other
reason to withhold the award. By Anonymous on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 02:15 pm: Vern, no I am not worried about the bid being too low, I am worried that after award, if a modification has to be made, there will be no funds to make the modification. This being a construction contract I have not seen many that did not require some modification. By Vern Edwards on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 02:21 pm: Anon: By joel hoffman on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 06:17 pm: Anon, your agency should have
developed a Government estimate for the scope of work you
advertised (Reference FAR Part 36). If the estimate compares
favorably with the low bid, you should have already realized
that there wouldn't be much, if any money left for changes and
other contigencies. If the low bid considerably exceeds the
estimate, you should re-examine the estimate. If still valid,
you might conclude that the low bid is unreasonable. The KO must
also determine that prices are reasonable before awarding a
construction contract. By joel hoffman on Monday, August 27, 2001 - 06:19 pm: Anon - to clarify - my opinion
assumes that you are a Federal Agency, subject to FAR... |