|
|
|
HOME | CONTENTS | DISCUSSIONS | BLOG | QUICK-KITs| STATES |
Search WWW Search wifcon.com |
Government Setting Contract Price | |
---|---|
By JP on
Wednesday, January 09, 2002 - 08:27 pm:
Under what authority does the Government set the price of the Contract in a competitive best value acquisition? By joel hoffman on Wednesday, January 09, 2002 - 08:40 pm: What type of contract is it, JP? Can you elaborate or are you just asking a general question? I know of design-build construction contracts awarded on the basis of the best design for the stated funding limit. There is nothing inherently wrong or illegal about that. happy sails! joel hoffman By Anonymous on Wednesday, January 09, 2002 - 09:42 pm: Please explain. Has the government actually stated the price that offerors must propose? By JP on Thursday, January 10, 2002 - 07:16 pm: An R&D contract, if the Government solicited competitive proposals without prices requesting a plan to satisfy a specific statement of objectives which the Government determines. This is not a contruction contract, even then the Government is only allowed to give an estimated price range. They are not allowed to disclose the Government estimate. A funding limit has nothing to do with stating we are going to award a contract for this price. By joel hoffman on Thursday, January 10, 2002 - 07:48 pm: JP, these comments only respond
to your statement that for a construction contract, "even then
the Government is only allowed to give an estimated range." By Kevin E. McGinn on Friday, January 25, 2002 - 10:44 am: I have used the Cost As an
Independent Variable (CAIV) concept to tell contractors what the
Gov't expects to pay for a service. While we identify our
expectation, we also invite contractors to tell us we are all
wet or to identify ways to modify our SOW or terms and
conditions so that we can achieve our expected price. |