By Anonymous on Monday, September
23, 2002 - 06:37 am:
Is the time spent traveling billable on govt contracts? I am a
sub on a govt contract and spent 3 hrs driving each way to
customer meetings out of state. Client (prime ktr) says that
"local travel" isn't billable. How can inter-state travel be
considered local and why would my time getting to and from the
meetings not be billable?
Please help.
By Vern Edwards on Monday,
September 23, 2002 - 09:20 am:
Your question is impossible to answer. The answer depends
entirely on the terms of your subcontract. You haven't even said
whether your subcontract is fixed-price, cost-reimbursement,
time-and-materials, or labor-hour. What does your contract say?
By Anonymous on Monday,
September 23, 2002 - 10:24 am:
The contract specifies an hourly rate and an NTE amount. It says
that travel expenses to and from DC will be reimbursed as
actuals up to the allowable US Govt per diem amounts.
By formerfed on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 07:59 am:
There isn't enough information to provide an answer. Does you
subcontract mention anything about what constitutes a billable
hour? In some cases there's language as what work gets billed
and what doesn't. Also the prime contract may have language that
bears on this. In the absence of anything specific, many CO's
will say that they don't want to pay for travel time.
In the future your proposal could address this to avoid
misunderstandings. But for the immediate situation, I would sit
down with the prime and iron things out. You could suggest a
meeting with the government CO as well and negotiate a
resolution
By Anonymous on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 10:14 am:
Thanks for your advice. My proposal did specify 2 2-day trips
plus per diem. The prime says that charging the govt for travel
time violated federal regulations. Prime does not say that the
contract prohibits it. I haven't been able to find any reg that
prohibits billing for travel time and Prime hasn't provided the
citation. Per FAR 31.204, costs are allowable if they are
reasonable & allocable. But for the contract, the cost would not
have been incurred.
By FormerFed2 on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 10:42 am:
As an AF CO (previous life) and as a Subcontract Administrator
(last ten years) I've often paid for travel time on LH and other
type subcontracts. The rule of thumb I use is whether travel is
happening during a time when they would normally be working. NO
overtime allowed.
Other than this, I would rely on whether or not the company has
a policy of normally paying for travel under those
circumstances.
I've never found a regulation to cover this situation.
If there is a provision in the prime contract (or your
subcontract) disallowing this, then you have to live with it.
Good Luck
By Vern Edwards on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 11:02 am:
Anonymous:
Hold on a minute.
I'm assuming that you want to charge the prime your hourly labor
rate during the time that you are traveling. So, if you charge
$100 per hour, you want to charge the prime $100 for each hour
that you sit in an airplane or in a car traveling to a meeting.
Is that right?
If so, then your customer may argue that such hours are not
being spent doing the work described in the subcontract
statement of work. That argument may or may not be a good one,
but it is one that I would expect some, if not many, government
contracting officers to make. Again, what did you and the prime
agree to when you negotiated the subcontract? What does the
subcontract say?
By the way, you're not charging the government, you're charging
the prime, which I presume is a private sector business firm.
FAR Subpart 31.2 may not be dispositive in your case,
notwithstanding the fact that the prime contract is a government
contract.
What does your subcontract say?
By Anonymous on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 11:14 am:
The subcontract says that travel to and from DC will be charged
as actuals. Since I spent 12 hours for 2 trips, I should be
reimbursed for those hours. While I may have just been sitting
in a car, I could not have done the required work without the
travel. The subcontract says that travel will be reimbursed as
actuals and that's what I expect to happen. Prime now says that
it violates federal regulations to charge the govt for travel
time and no-one is able to provide such a citation.
By Kennedy How on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 11:39 am:
The prime may be objecting as it may not be an allowable cost
that he can pass onto the Government. If the contract between
the sub and prime has a separate agreement, then that's separate
and distinct agreement, and the prime will have to eat the cost.
If the prime has to pay the cost to be in DC, then they have to
pay for the time it took to GET to DC.
I'd be curious to know how the contracts are written. We have
some contracts where I think we pay for folks to travel to
conferences and such, and we pay them to travel to said
conferences at whatever their proposal and subsequent contract
rates are.
Kennedy
By FormerFed2 on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 03:22 pm:
I wholeheartedly agree with the above observations. On the Prime
Contract that I currently work on, and my previous prime
contract, these specific issues are/were silent. But this
situation is addressed in our DOE approved procedures and
policies.
The bottom line is that normal work hours need to be charged to
something. The purpose for the trip was to support the
subcontract (under the prime). That time, which would be
considered normal work time must be charged to some charge
account, and no other work was being supported while the
individual was on the trip.
Our DOE approved Policies and Procedures state that time must be
charged to the activity being supported at the time. Our
procedure also states that when on travel status, we can charge
only that time we would normally be working. So If we normally
work 8 hours on Friday, and we are travelling and working 10
hours, we can only charge 8 hours to that project on our time
card. If we are normally off on Saturday, and travel that day,
no time can be charged.
By Anonymous on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 07:39 pm:
FormerFed2,
Thank you for aknowledging that the time must be charged to
something. If the time can't be charged, I don't get paid
By joel hoffman on Tuesday,
September 24, 2002 - 10:38 pm:
I agree with Formerfed2. If it's during normal work hours, you
have to bill it to something. Unless the prime contract says
otherwise, it should be allowable by the Feds. happy sails! joel
hoffman
|