|
|
|
HOME | CONTENTS | DISCUSSIONS | BLOG | QUICK-KITs| STATES |
Search WWW Search wifcon.com |
"Rolling IDIQ contracts" |
|
---|---|
By
Susan Marie Paolini
on Tuesday, February 22, 2000 - 02:43 pm:
Wonder how you would deal with setting minimum obligation under the IDIQ? If you hold back on the potential minimum (for possibility of additional "freshening"), how much do you lose in price advantages from original offerors, who price on a lower minimum guarantee? By Stan Livingstone on Tuesday, February 22, 2000 - 07:41 am: One potential problem area is
consistency of evaluations and source selection rational over
time. Changes in the marketplace, capabilities, technology, etc.
can really alter what you might want. You didn't mention what
you're buying, and whether you plan to not make awards to some
of the offerors. If you intend to make limited awards based on
some criteria, think everything through carefully. By Vern Edwards on Monday, February 21, 2000 - 11:26 pm: The new contracts would just be
new awards based on the same terms as the first generation
awards. I cannot think of any legal objection to that,
especially if you notify the first generation contractors that
you reserve the right to do it. I have not heard of anyone
actually doing it, but I have heard people talk about doing it. By Bl14x@nih.gov on Thursday, February 17, 2000 - 11:23 am: Has anyone ever considered a multiple award IDIQ contract where, periodically, additional contractors were permitted to receive contracts after the basic awards were made? I'm thinking of something along the lines of the Federal Supply Schedules, where contracts are awarded upon receipt of an offer anywhere in the term of the schedule. Can this, or something like it be done in a multiple award IDIQ contract? (e.g., once a year during a multiple year contract, could an announcement be made in the CBD that the agency will consider other offerors and make additional awards) |