SEC. 883. ESTABLISHMENT OF INTEGRATED REVIEW TEAM ON DEFENSE
ACQUISITION INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT EXCHANGE.
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall direct the
Defense Business Board to convene an integrated review team (in
this section referred to as the “exchange team”) to undertake a
study on facilitating the exchange of defense industry personnel
on term assignments within the Department of Defense.
(2) MEMBER PARTICIPATION.—
(A) DEFENSE BUSINESS BOARD.—The Chairman of the Defense Business
Board shall select six members from the membership of the Board
to participate on the exchange team, including one member to
lead the team.
(B) DEFENSE INNOVATION BOARD.—The Chairman of the Defense
Innovation Board shall select five appropriate members from the
membership of their Board to participate on the exchange team.
(C) DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD.—The Chairman of the Defense Science
Board shall select five appropriate members from the membership
of their Board to participate on the exchange team.
(D) REQUIRED EXPERIENCE.—The Chairmen referred to in
subparagraphs (A) through (C) shall ensure that members have
significant legislative or regulatory expertise and reflect
diverse experiences in the public and private sector.
(3) SCOPE.—The study conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall—
(A) review legal, ethical, and financial disclosure requirements
for industry-government exchanges;
(B) review existing or previous industry-government exchange
programs such as the Department of State’s Franklin Fellows
Program and the Information Technology Exchange Program;
(C) review how the military departments address legal, ethical,
and financial requirements for members of the reserve components
who also maintain civilian employment in the defense industry;
(D) produce specific and detailed recommendations for any
legislation, including the amendment or repeal of regulations,
as well as non-legislative approaches, that the members of the
exchange team conducting the study determine necessary to—
(i) reduce barriers to industry-government exchange to encourage
the flow of acquisition best practices;
(ii) ensure continuing financial and ethical integrity; and
(iii) protect the best interests of the Department of Defense;
and
(E) produce such additional recommendations for legislation as
the members consider appropriate.
(4) ACCESS TO INFORMATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall
provide the exchange team with timely access to appropriate
information, data, resources, and analysis so that the exchange
team may conduct a thorough and independent analysis as required
under this subsection.
(b) Briefing.—Not later than December 31, 2018, the exchange
team shall provide an interim briefing to the congressional
defense committees on the study conducted under subsection (a)
(c) Final Report.—Not later than March 1, 2019, the exchange
team shall submit a final report on the study to the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the
congressional defense committees. |
Establishment of integrated review team on defense acquisition
industry-government exchange (sec. 883)
The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 842) that
would direct the Chairman of the Defense Business Board to
convene an integrated review team with members of the Defense
Innovation Board and Defense Science Board to undertake a study
on the exchange of defense industry personnel on term
assignments within the Department. The study shall review: (1)
Legal, ethical, and financial disclosure requirements for
industry-government exchanges; (2) Existing or previous
industry-government exchange programs; and (3) How the military
departments address legal, ethical, and financial requirements
for reserve component servicemembers who also maintain civilian employment in
the defense industry. The team shall also produce
recommendations to reduce barriers to industry-government
exchange while ensuring financial and ethical integrity to
protect the best interests of the Department.
The House bill contained no similar
provision.
The House recedes. |