|
|
|
HOME | CONTENTS | DISCUSSIONS | BLOG | QUICK-KITs| STATES |
Search WWW Search wifcon.com |
TITLE III OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE |
|
House Conference Report 108-767 |
|
SEC. 324. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE OF SECURITY-GUARD FUNCTIONS.(a) CONDITIONAL EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. Subsection (c) of section 332 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107314; 116 Stat. 2513) is amended
(2) No security-guard functions may be performed under any contract entered into using the authority provided under this section during any period in which the authority for contractor performance of security-guard functions under this section is not in effect under paragraph (1). The term of any contract entered into using such authority may not extend beyond September 30, 2006..(b) REAFFIRMATION AND REVISION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT. Subsection (d) of such section is amend- ed to read as follows:(d) REPORT AND PLAN REQUIRED.Not later than December 1, 2005, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
|
The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 362) that would extend for two years the authority granted in section 332 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003. (Public Law 107-314) to hire contract security guards on a temporary basis to fill positions that would otherwise be filled by members of the Armed Forces. The House bill contained no similar provision. The House recedes with an amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on the use of this authority no later than December 1, 2005. |
Senate Report 108-260 |
|
The committee recommends a provision
that would extend for two years the authority granted in section
332 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2003 to hire contract security guards on a temporary
basis to fill positions that would otherwise be filled by members
of the Armed Forces. The committee is disappointed that the Department of Defense has yet to submit a report on the Department's long-term plans for meeting its increased security guard needs after September 11, 2001, as required by section 332. This report was due in May 2003. Accordingly, the extended authority would be contingent upon the submission of the required report. In addition, the committee notes that the material submitted by the Department in support of its legislative proposal on security guards includes the statement that: `Meeting these increases through expanding either civilian or active military workforce is difficult because the end strength of both workforces is constrained and there are many other demands for these personnel.' Section 129 of title 10, United States Code, prohibits the use of any constraint or limitation on the number of employees in the Department. Section 129(f) requires the Secretary of each military department and the head of each defense agency to certify compliance with this provision on an annual basis. For this reason, the provision recommended by the committee would amend the reporting requirement in section 332 to require that the report specifically identify any limitation or constraint on the end strength of the Department's civilian workforce that makes it difficult to meet security guard requirements by hiring civilian employees.
|