|
|
|
HOME | CONTENTS | DISCUSSIONS | BLOG | QUICK-KITs| STATES |
Search WWW Search wifcon.com |
TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS Subtitle C--Planning, Programming, and Management |
|
JWNDAA Section |
House Conference Report 109-702 |
SEC. 736. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED OPTION PERIODS FOR EXTENSION OF CURRENT CONTRACTS UNDER TRICARE. (a) Additional Number of Authorized Periods-
(b) Report on Contracting Mechanisms for Health Care Service Support Contracts- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on contracting mechanisms under consideration for future contracts for health care service support under section 1097 of title 10, United States Code. The report shall include an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages for the Department of Defense (including the potential for stimulating competition and the effect on health care beneficiaries of the Department) of providing in such contracts for a single term of 5 years, with a single optional period of extension of an additional 5 years if performance under such contract is rated as `excellent'. |
Additional authorized option periods
for extension
of current contracts under TRICARE
(sec. 736)
The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 731) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to extend TRICARE managed care support contracts for up to 2 years. The provision would authorize the Secretary to act only after review by Congress of the minimum performance standards required in order to be eligible for an extension, including cost and beneficiary satisfaction, as well as the justification for any extension. The provision would also require the Secretary to report to Congress on future contracting mechanisms under consideration for TRICARE support, including an assessment of a contract for a single term of 5 years, with a single optional period of extension of an additional 5 years, if performance by the contractor is rated ‘‘excellent.’’ The House bill contained no similar provision. The House recedes with an amendment that would require a cost-benefit analysis to be conducted as part of the justification for such extension. |
Congressional Record, June 22, 2006, S6353 |
|
Introduced for Senator Graham as
Amendment 4510 without discussion. Agreed to as part of the
amended S. 2766 that passed Senate.
|