HOME  |  CONTENTS  |  DISCUSSIONS  |  BLOG  |  QUICK-KITs|  STATES

Google

       Search WWW Search wifcon.com

Back to WSARA Contents

TITLE I--ACQUISITION ORGANIZATION

Section 103

House Conference Report 111-124

SEC. 103. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSES FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Designation of Senior Official Responsibility for Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses-

      (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior official in the Office of the Secretary of Defense as the principal official of the Department of Defense responsible for conducting and overseeing performance assessments and root cause analyses for major defense acquisition programs.

      (2) NO PROGRAM EXECUTION RESPONSIBILITY- The Secretary shall ensure that the senior official designated under paragraph (1) is not responsible for program execution.

      (3) STAFF AND RESOURCES- The Secretary shall assign to the senior official designated under paragraph (1) appropriate staff and resources necessary to carry out official's function under this section.

    (b) Responsibilities- The senior official designated under subsection (a) shall be responsible for the following:

      (1) Carrying out performance assessments of major defense acquisition programs in accordance with the requirements of subsection (c) periodically or when requested by the Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, the Secretary of a military department, or the head of a Defense Agency.

      (2) Conducting root cause analyses for major defense acquisition programs in accordance with the requirements of subsection (d) when required by section 2433a(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 206(a) of this Act), or when requested by the Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, the Secretary of a military department, or the head of a Defense Agency.

      (3) Issuing policies, procedures, and guidance governing the conduct of performance assessments and root cause analyses by the military departments and the Defense Agencies.

      (4) Evaluating the utility of performance metrics used to measure the cost, schedule, and performance of major defense acquisition programs, and making such recommendations to the Secretary of Defense as the official considers appropriate to improve such metrics.

      (5) Advising acquisition officials on performance issues regarding a major defense acquisition program that may arise--

        (A) prior to certification under section 2433a of title 10, United States Code (as so added);

        (B) prior to entry into full-rate production; or

        (C) in the course of consideration of any decision to request authorization of a multiyear procurement contract for the program.

    (c) Performance Assessments- For purposes of this section, a performance assessment with respect to a major defense acquisition program is an evaluation of the following:

      (1) The cost, schedule, and performance of the program, relative to current metrics, including performance requirements and baseline descriptions.

      (2) The extent to which the level of program cost, schedule, and performance predicted relative to such metrics is likely to result in the timely delivery of a level of capability to the warfighter that is consistent with the level of resources to be expended and provides superior value to alternative approaches that may be available to meet the same military requirement.

    (d) Root Cause Analyses- For purposes of this section and section 2433a of title 10, United States Code (as so added), a root cause analysis with respect to a major defense acquisition program is an assessment of the underlying cause or causes of shortcomings in cost, schedule, or performance of the program, including the role, if any, of--

      (1) unrealistic performance expectations;

      (2) unrealistic baseline estimates for cost or schedule;

      (3) immature technologies or excessive manufacturing or integration risk;

      (4) unanticipated design, engineering, manufacturing, or technology integration issues arising during program performance;

      (5) changes in procurement quantities;

      (6) inadequate program funding or funding instability;

      (7) poor performance by government or contractor personnel responsible for program management; or

      (8) any other matters.

    (e) Support of Applicable Capabilities and Expertise- The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the senior official designated under subsection (a) has the support of other Department of Defense officials with relevant capabilities and expertise needed to carry out the requirements of this section.

    (f) Annual Report- Not later than March 1 each year, beginning in 2010, the official responsible for conducting and overseeing performance assessments and root cause analyses for major defense acquisition programs shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken under this section during the preceding year.

Performance assessments and root cause analyses for major defense acquisition programs (sec. 103)

The House amendment contained a provision (sec. 104) that would require the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior official in the Office of the Secretary of Defense as the principal Department of Defense official responsible for issuing policies, procedures, and guidance governing the conduct of performance assessments for major defense acquisition programs.

The Senate bill contained no similar provision.

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the Secretary to designate a senior official responsible for conducting and overseeing performance assessments and root cause analyses for major defense acquisition programs.



 

House Committee on Armed Services Report 111-101 with H. R. 2101

SECTION 104--OVERSIGHT OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

This section would require the official responsible for performance assessment to issue policies, procedures, and guidance for assessing the acquisition programs of the Department of Defense including the extent to which they deliver sufficient capability to the warfighter, achieve timely delivery of such capability, and deliver a level of value consistent with resources expended. This section would require the official to periodically assess the suitability of the baseline descriptions of major defense acquisition programs (MDAP) for providing a basis for such performance assessment and to make recommendations for their improvement to the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

This section would make the official responsible for the records of the Department's earned value management system. It would also authorize the participation of the official in reviews of MDAPs at a Nunn-McCurdy breach, entry into full-rate production, or any decision to request multi-year procurement authority. This section would require the official to provide the congressional defense committees with an annual activities report by March 1 each year in unclassified form with a classified annex if necessary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT  l CONTACT

Where in Federal Contracting?