|
FAR
15.608: Prohibitions: Use of data from unsolicited
proposals |
|
U.
S. Court of Federal Claims - Key Excerpts |
|
|
| U.
S. Court of Federal Claims - Listing of Decisions |
| For
the Government |
For
the Protester |
| |
|
|
U.
S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Key Excerpts |
|
The Court of Federal Claims found that Xerxe
complied with section 15.609(a) by marking the title page of its unsolicited
proposal, but did not comply with section 15.609(b) by failing to include a
restrictive legend on each sheet of the data it wanted restricted.
Xerxe Group, Inc. v. United States, No. 99-924-C, slip op. at 7
n.2 (November 30, 2000) (opinion and order).
Only Xerxe’s cover letter and "Company Profile and Capability
Statement" were marked with the restrictive legend in accordance with
section 15.609(b). Id.
Its failure to identify and clearly demarcate what it considered
restricted data is fatal to its claim. (The
Xerxe Group, Inc. v. United States, No. 01-5055, February 4, 2002) |
|
| U.
S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Listing of Decisions |
| For
the Government |
For
the Protester |
|
The
Xerxe Group, Inc. v. United States, No. 01-5055, February 4,
2002 (Pdf
Version) |
|
|
|
